Go to page

Bibliographic Metadata

KMS re-contextualization : recognizing learnings from OMIS research
AuthorMühlburger, Manuel ; Oppl, Stefan ; Stary, Christian
Published in
VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 2017, Vol. 47, Issue 3
PublishedEmerald Publishing, 2017
Document typeJournal Article
Keywords (EN)Classification / Knowledge management systems / Organizational memory information systems
URNurn:nbn:at:at-ubl:3-1072 Persistent Identifier (URN)
 The work is publicly available
KMS re-contextualization [0.24 mb]
Abstract (English)


Deployment of knowledge management systems (KMSs) suffers from low adoption in organizational reality that is attributed to a lack of perceivable added value for people in actual work situations. Poor task/technology fit in the process of knowledge retrieval appears to be a major factor influencing this issue. Existing research indicates a lack of re-contextualizing stored information provided by KMSs in a particular situation. Existing research in the area of organizational memory information systems (OMISs) has thoroughly examined and widely discussed the topic of re-contextualization. The purpose of this paper, thus, is to examine how KMS design can benefit from OMIS research on approaches for re-contextualization in knowledge retrieval.


This paper examines OMIS literature and inductively derives a categorization scheme for KMS according to their strategy of re-contextualizing knowledge. The authors have validated the scheme validated in a multiple case study that examines the differentiatory value of the scheme for approaches with various re-contextualization strategies.


The classification scheme allows a step-by-step selection of approaches for re-contextualization of information in KMS design and development derived from OMIS research. The case study has demonstrated the applicability of the developed scheme and shows that the differentiation criteria can be applied unambiguously.

Research limitations/implications:

Because of the chosen case study approach for validation, the validation results may lack generalizability.

Practical implications:

The scheme enables an informed selection of KMSs appropriate for a particular OMIS use case, as the schemes attributes serve as design rationale for a certain architecture or constellation of components. Developers can not only select from various approaches when designing re-contextualizaton but also come up with rationales for each candidate because of structured representation. Hence, stakeholders can be supported in a more informed way and design KMSs more effectively along organizational change processes.


The paper addresses an identified need for systematic characterization of KMS approaches and systems intending to meet the objectives of OMISs. As such, it allows streamlining further research in this field, as approaches can be judged according to their originality and positioned relative to each other.

The PDF-Document has been downloaded 2 times.
CC-BY-License (4.0)Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License